A tool for primary and junior high teachers who lose hours each week writing class newsletters. Teachers just talk to it: the AI asks back for missing details, assembles the draft, and outputs HTML or PDF laid out to survive A4 printing. Because it keeps the paper habit intact, even teachers uneasy with IT can adopt it.
Judges said the data-backed framing made the need clear, and that narrowing the scope to one specific school task gave it practical value. They also credited the team for putting it in teachers' hands for feedback, and the polish of the Flutter app.
Behind the practicality the judges mentioned sits a deliberate restraint. The team did not try to replace paper distribution with something digital; printing and handing out remains the endpoint, so a school can adopt the tool without changing its routine. Pushing input toward conversation, with the AI asking back for whatever is missing, also removes the burden of learning a template. The narrow target may itself be an advantage — the value fits in one sentence.
See all winners of 第2回 AI Agent Hackathon with Google Cloud →
Summaries are written by this site. Project pages include demo videos, screenshots and the team's own write-up (videos may autoplay).